LLM-WIKI-MCP profile verification

Type: agentic-system-analyses/types/agentic-system-verification.md

Verification

I checked all ten axes of the memory profile against the handed records, their annotations and the supplied reconciliation. The corpus, sidecar and withdrawal supersessions resolve to the memory declarations; the combined history account remains valid alongside its narrower objects and routes. No replacement records, source quotations or source reads were needed. The empty profile answers file supplies no additional argument or evidence.

Storage, form and lineage

Files, SQLite and process memory are supported respectively by the retained objects and local persistence routes, the index/provenance/decision records, and the cache/session mechanisms. The profile does not confuse Markdown or JSON encoding with substrate, wiki links with a graph store, or the frozen evidence checkout with deployed repository-backed memory. See MEM-OBJ-wiki, MEM-OBJ-pages-fts, MEM-OBJ-provenance and MEM-RTE-transcript-decision.

The form units separate prose interpreted by people/models from fields and lexical features consumed by fixed code. In particular, diagnostic answer bodies are not classified solely by their JSON envelope: MEM-OBJ-runtime-traces supports both the symbolic fields and retained natural-language answers. The provider's component form does not resolve accumulated provider memory.

The lineage findings distinguish caller-authored input, imported source material, deterministic compilation and interaction-derived retention. Known derivation paths do not resolve initial corpus provenance or authenticate explicit caller records. Those uncertainties remain local as well as axis-wide. See MEM-OBJ-notes, MEM-OBJ-ask-history, MEM-RTE-cli-history and RT-RTE-docs-consolidate.

Authority and admission

Knowledge, ranking, routing, enforcement, learning and afforded instruction have distinguishable consumers and effects in the cited records. The profile separates answering context from lexical ranking, prior-question query resolution from model interpretation, and configuration selection/gating from natural-language guidance. Its grouped units are coarse but identify the operative parts and effects without upgrading an afforded external consumer to wired model use. See RT-RTE-agentic-ask, RT-BAP-config-control, MEM-OBJ-provenance and EPI-RTE-note-template.

Learning authority is supported at automatic reduction consumers, independently of the output's later knowledge role; it asserts neither improved competence nor revised model weights. The recursive archive's external knowledge use remains afforded. See MEM-RTE-history-compaction and MEM-RTE-recursive-context.

Write-agency units distinguish automatic derivation/admission from unresolved original caller control. Triggering ask, ingestion, repair or compression is not treated as a human decision approving each resulting retained item. Conversely, generic direct-body/configuration callers do not establish manual admission. The separation is supported by RT-RTE-knowledge-write, RT-RTE-runtime-config, MEM-RTE-transcript-decision and the history records.

Curation and read-back

The curation findings follow implemented transformations: history/transcript reduction supports consolidation; destructive live-history reduction supports local decay; replacement and structural revision support evolution; tombstone-preserving withdrawal supports invalidation. The invalidation finding is explicitly bounded to the history-preserving branch. The profile does not infer synthesis from a summary label, promotion from a suggestion, or retained-entry deduplication from an admission signature guard. See MEM-RTE-history-compaction, MEM-RTE-transcript-decision, MEM-RTE-page-withdrawal and MEM-RTE-cli-history.

Direction and signal units distinguish requested retained-content returns from automatic history/control-state supply inside later work. Requested recursive context is pull, not an extra push. Recent-history recency/count/budget selection and broad configuration availability support coarse signals; matching source identity selects the provenance row used by ingestion. Lexical ranking of requested retrieval remains ranking authority rather than an inferred-lexical push finding. See RT-RTE-store-ask, RT-OBJ-context-pack, MEM-RTE-recursive-context and MEM-OBJ-provenance.

The profile preserves both historical prompt channels: reduced recent turns and sanitized full-row history tool evidence, potentially including stored prompts. It does not transfer the dedicated history budget to that second channel, the second synthesis prompt, plain ask or store ask. The runtime and memory findings agree; the workflow account supplies no contrary completeness or delivery guarantee.

Trace routes and inventory coverage

Automatic history compaction and transcript clipping produce durable later-context artifacts and support local wired trace-learning positives. The concrete recursive-context return is sufficient architectural support for the archive route without establishing external model activation. Raw logs alone are not promoted to qualifying updates. See MEM-RTE-history-compaction, MEM-RTE-recursive-context and MEM-RTE-transcript-decision.

The session-log finding is supported for recorded ask conversation consumed by compaction. Explicitly supplied histories/transcripts retain unresolved original provenance in a separate unit. Tool labels, JSONL serialization and timestamps do not establish tool-trace, event-stream or trajectory inputs. The profile emits no unsupported local trace-learning negative or system-wide trace-source inapplicability.

All axis assessments remain partial. Additional editable-guidance/maintenance alternatives and any accumulated provider state remain included but unresolved; no positive local witness closes those inventories. The report's untraced schema-consumer chain does not establish automatic schema delivery or a schema-specific comparison finding. See MEM-OBJ-wiki, RT-RTE-knowledge-write and RT-CMP-ollama-model. These are faithfully expressed coverage uncertainties, not concealed absences. Complete-value statistics, exhaustive instruction-surface comparisons, observed reliance and causal memory benefit remain unsupported, as the profile already states. No unsupported emitted comparison value or materially misleading coverage assertion was found.

Blockers

none

Limits

none