Exocomp report verification
Type: agentic-system-analyses/types/agentic-system-verification.md
Verification
The current reports support publication of a bounded implementation account. No material blocker remains. I read the complete supplied reports, declarations, annotations, correction answers, reconciliation, report-check and previous verification. Report-check contains no structural finding. I independently traced consequential source behavior rather than accepting the answers or analysts' validation statements as verification. SRC-1's checkout HEAD equals the frozen revision and its working tree is clean. No target executable, test, example, provider or service was run.
The boundary remains supported: Exocomp encloses inference, tool dispatch, contractor processes, retained project state and shipped operator clients. Its whole-system scope includes the material shipped callers rather than treating API callers as external. The top-level frozen tree agrees with its coverage table. Generated assets, external providers and GUI dependencies do not establish deployment or efficacy; these exclusions do not remove the authored consumer paths from the analysis.
Records, evidence and status dispositions
The following groups cover every declared record and the annotations and consequential narrative or ledger findings depending on them. I checked their source anchors and evidence interpretation, including the difference between implementation, requested model behavior and observed operation. Supporting passages remain in the cited records; deterministic quotation occurrence and link resolution are code checks, not the basis of this semantic judgment.
- Runtime components, grants and prompt authority. RT-CMP-planner-model, RT-CMP-coder-model and RT-CMP-summarizer-model correctly distinguish role defaults, caller-selected summarizer model and mutable provider/alias resolution. SRC-1
source/agents/NewAgent.go,source/types/Config.go,source/tools/Agents.goand the cited role YAML support these identities, not exact weight pins or provider-side immutability. The inspected Session request does not update parameters. RT-OBJ-role-grants, RT-BAP-role-prompt and RT-CLM-role-separation distinguish installed tool predicates from model-interpreted prose. SRC-1source/tools/Toolset.go,source/tools/Humans.goandsource/engine/Session.gosupport the Answer exception and qualified dispatch. Planner Go execution and lexical file checks justify withholding universal role and confinement guarantees. The revised skill contribution to prompt authority is now restricted to its actual helper/bare-name entry point. - Runtime progression and effects. RT-RTE-planner-chat, RT-RTE-contractor-work, RT-RTE-agent-inquire, RT-RTE-program-execution, RT-RTE-client-tools and RT-RTE-file-admission retain supported progression, selection and effect boundaries. SRC-1
source/engine/Session.go,source/tools/Agents.go,source/tools/getAgentWorkReport.go,source/tools/Programs.go,source/tools/Files.go,source/tools/resolveSandboxPath.go,source/tools/sanitizeSandboxPath.go, terminal/JSONL clients and the web CallTool handler support first-choice inference, sequential tool calls, tool-free return, selected child report delivery and ordinary host effects. Direct calls do not independently initiate inference or guarantee backup. Browser cooperation is not server-wide serialization or authentication. Inquire's afforded status remains appropriate without embedded grants; the epistemic architectural status implemented uses a different vocabulary and does not contradict it. Operation remains uninspected. - Runtime change admission and absence. RT-RTE-skill-loading now separates discovery refresh, loaded-object admission and generic notices from helper-driven system-body insertion/removal. SRC-1
source/tools/Skills.go,source/tools/readSkills.go,source/engine/Session.go,source/schemas/ToolCall.goandsource/types/Command.gosupport that distinction. RT-ABS-skill-grants is a warranted bounded absence over all embedded role YAML, not an absence of skill implementation or external customization. The same scoped search supplies no default Inquire grant. RT-RTE-requirement-signoff correctly limits its oracle to AST symbol presence and distinguishes immediate status assignment from source-derived later status. SRC-1 requirement readers/writer and HasSymbol support this account. RT-RTE-build-install is supported bytoolchain/actions/BuildExocomps.go,toolchain/utils/Build.goandinstaller/actions/InstallExocomp.go: compilation and copying can produce later executable inputs, but establish neither successful distribution nor a model-driven self-update loop. - Memory objects. MEM-OBJ-agent-messages, MEM-OBJ-requirement-behavior, MEM-OBJ-requirement-declaration, MEM-OBJ-bug-description, MEM-OBJ-bug-status, MEM-OBJ-changelog-entry and MEM-OBJ-debug-snapshot retain the material form, substrate and consumer distinctions. SRC-1 Agent/Session/Recovery, Requirements helpers, Bugs and Changelog support raw transcripts versus summaries, intended behavior versus regenerated declarations, interpreted descriptions versus status filters and diagnostic envelopes versus automatic inference input. The reports do not mistake lifecycle metadata or report presence for truth. Unknown caller authorship and opaque model processing remain local rather than becoming false absence findings.
- Memory routes and annotations. MEM-RTE-session-recovery, MEM-RTE-requirement-update, MEM-RTE-project-records, MEM-RTE-operator-display, MEM-RTE-role-discovery and MEM-BAP-retained-content preserve their supported consumer paths. SRC-1
source/engine/Recovery.go, terminal/web/JSONL setup,source/tools/readAgents.go,source/agents/SetRole.go,source/agents/NewAgent.go, requirement/project-record helpers and web/browser display consumers support restoration without process revival, source-first requirements, distinct retirement rules and process-local template registration. Child initialization precedes child tool discovery; parent registration alone does not establish the child's effective template. The contractor, Inquire and Signoff annotations preserve selection and lineage without redefining their parent records. The revised skill annotation and human-answer write-side account now correctly distinguish qualified generic message admission from bare-name special branches. Transcript recovery does not imply restoration of pending waits or loaded-skill bookkeeping. - Epistemic objects. EPI-OBJ-specification, EPI-OBJ-implemented-status, EPI-OBJ-bug-description, EPI-OBJ-fixed-status, EPI-OBJ-changelog-entry and EPI-OBJ-website-content have supported content and authority distinctions. SRC-1 Requirements, Bugs, Changelog and Websites identify the payloads and fixed consumers. None confers factual warrant merely through storage, event naming or the implemented label. Specification transformation describes direct-method capacity, not successful ordinary Define* dispatch.
- Epistemic checks, dispositions and imports. EPI-RTE-symbol-check, EPI-RTE-signoff-disposition and EPI-RTE-requirement-refresh correctly separate structural evidence, status admission and later reconstruction. SRC-1
source/utils/ast/HasSymbol.go,source/utils/ast/hasFunc.goand requirement helpers support the concrete symbol deduction and precedence/cleanup findings, not behavior verification. EPI-RTE-bug-records, EPI-RTE-bug-closure and EPI-RTE-changelog-records distinguish importing and retaining reports from checking repairs. SRC-1 Bugs/Changelog and their writers support fixed-list suppression without universal erasure and Remove as append. EPI-RTE-website-fetch is supported by Websites and conversion helpers: bounded import with transport lineage, not source endorsement or extraction-completeness certification. - Epistemic answer, projection and design claims. EPI-RTE-human-answers now preserves implemented qualified advisory delivery and bounds the panic to the bare-name alternative. SRC-1 Humans, Session, ToolCall/Command parsing, web CallTool,
app/engine/Session.goandapp/controllers/Chat.gosupport the revised record, both ledger functions and dependent conclusion. EPI-RTE-inquire-projection is supported by SummarizeMessages and ASCII formatting; its concrete projection loses the tool result and newline as stated. No reference comparison establishes model summary fidelity. EPI-CLM-correct-results and EPI-CLM-summary-fidelity accurately remain doctrine/design findings from planner/tester/summarizer prompts. Testing capacity is real; no supplied execution or acceptance instance establishes universal correctness, accepted explanatory knowledge, benefit or causal improvement. The bounded conclusion correctly withholds system-complete negatives where branches remain unassessed. The revised skill ledger retains distinct qualified loaded-state and helper instruction functions. - Workflow. WF-CLM-project-phases and the contractor annotation faithfully describe instructed coordination rather than an enforced or observed lifecycle. SRC-1 planner/architect/coder/tester prompts, Toolset, Requirements, Agents, report extraction and JSONL QuitHook support the selected workflow, the Define* obstruction and the distinction between child exit selection and parent report-presence admission. Contractor delegation does not establish new requirement artifact production. Existing read capacity, immediate file effects, requested tests and planner-chosen repair remain supported. A nonempty report is not a validated patch or a correct delivered product; rejected report delivery and cancellation do not roll back files.
All explicit Part of relations have semantic containment: collected contractor messages are a retained part of contractor work; symbol checking and status disposition are distinct functions within Signoff; deterministic projection is a part of Inquire. A cross-kind parent does not undermine these relations. No material undeclared part requiring split supersession was established.
The two amendments in reconciliation identify the same bug-description and changelog-entry referents while preserving both declarations and findings. Other narrower objects, valid containers and overlapping routes have different boundaries and do not require supersession. Its dispositions on persistence, HasMethod, specification obstruction, answer delivery, skill force, role reach and report acceptance match the current records and source behavior. Memory's Integration issues mentions an older answer refusal fragment; reconciliation explicitly distinguishes that historical objection from the current epistemic record. It is not an unresolved conflict between these pinned members. No remaining cross-report disagreement needs an anchored conflict or limitation.
Correction checks and consequential omission searches
I judged all supplied corrected answers afresh, including dependent narrative, annotations and ledger rows. Runtime and memory's qualified skill repairs hold. Epistemic's answer and split skill-function repairs hold. Memory's answer-retention repair holds, and workflow's specification obstruction repair remains supported. Reconciliation now carries those actual entry-point distinctions rather than repeating the previous defective consumer attribution.
The frozen top-level tree, tool registry and shipped caller/consumer dependencies selected three consequential omission questions: whether alternate callers reach the special Answer/skill branches; whether catalog refresh changes the material later consumed; and whether installed Define* grants reach the instructed specification producer. Searches covered production Go callers in source, browser controllers/engine and build/installer paths, plus all embedded role YAML. These are source-text checks within SRC-1, not execution evidence.
Caller identity and downstream force. I traced model ReceiveChatResponse, terminal/JSONL slash commands, browser AnswerQuestion and HTTP parsing into Session.CallTool. SRC-1 source/schemas/ToolCall.go, source/types/Command.go, source/ui/web/routes/session/CallTool.go and source/engine/Session.go preserve qualified names. GetTool normalizes only its local lookup; CallTool's special branches compare the original name with bare humans or skills. The retained parser and branch quotations in RT-RTE-skill-loading and EPI-RTE-human-answers therefore support different consumers and force at these entry points. Qualified Answer stores text, releases the waiter and appends its own generic result; Ask/Choose separately appends the returned answer or error, after which the model response loop can continue. Direct Answer itself does not initiate inference or backup. Browser Waiting can refuse its asynchronous submission, and local validation success is not delivery. GetLastMessage is not call-specific. The bare-name scan really does index len(Messages) under the mutex without deferred unlock; it is not reached by those shipped qualified parsers. No unconditional concurrent append order is inferred.
Catalog, loaded object and instruction body. SRC-1 source/tools/Skills.go and source/tools/readSkills.go show construction/List discovery refresh, Load's dependency checks and object assignment, Unload's deletion and Execute's loaded-object selection. Refresh does not replace loaded objects or mutate Agent.Messages. Qualified calls append notices; helpers or bare-name API calls separately afford body changes. SRC-1 Session's duplicate/removal checks operate on body text, so changed text can coexist with older bodies, and withdrawal is not general same-name historical cleanup. The direct insertion helper's missing-program check is weaker than Skills.Load's gate. Production-call searches found the helper uses inside the bare-name branches, not an additional shipped qualified injection chain. The supporting route/annotation passages preserve these distinctions without claiming observed activation or complete restart-state recovery.
Specification handoff. SRC-1 source/tools/Toolset.go lowercases the method suffix; source/schemas/ToolCall.go preserves the special Define capitalization; Requirements uses exact method membership, schema matching and mixed-case dispatch. Thus the ordinary installed architect route cannot reach Define* definition branches under either spelling. The retained passages in MEM-RTE-requirement-update and WF-CLM-project-phases establish the obstruction. Direct methods and valid Signoff/reconstruction remain available. Source-first reconstruction and unimplemented-only serialization still prevent treating later implemented entries as preserved behavioral specifications or archived acceptance decisions.
Optional omission expansion stops because all selected questions have supported dispositions and no identified material challenge remains undisposed. Further unrelated helper inspection is not reasonably likely to change the supported central conclusions at their present breadth. Detailed browser rendering, extraction fidelity, historical run provenance, arbitrary program-created stores, provider internals, successful restoration and efficacy remain outside established comparisons. The reports already express those uncertainties beside the affected routes and do not emit absence, complete-coverage or observed-success values from them. They are faithfully scoped uncertainty rather than additional publication defects. No supported mechanism was withdrawn to achieve acceptance.
Blockers
none
Limits
none