llmwiki-marimo memory profile
Type: agentic-system-analyses/types/agentic-system-memory-profile.md
Comparison rationale
This profile classifies accepted records, not fresh source inspection. All positive findings are implementation-level wiring. No observed execution, activation benefit or causal improvement is claimed. Known coverage of storage and form concerns the recorded retained-part inventory, not every internal algorithm or deployment artifact. Other axes retain missing provenance and unaudited alternatives rather than extending one inspected witness to all routes.
Admission, authority and trace learning
The normal web save has a human content decision; marimo and convenience saves admit subsequently structured prose automatically. These are separate write mechanisms in RT-RTE-chat-save. Starting the latter save is not approval of its generated content. A conversation-derived durable page supports trace learning at this wired route, even though factual acceptance and improved future capacity remain unestablished. Its original input is conversational turns, not the answer agent's full tool transcript. The downstream page supplies knowledge to QA; at the structuring/update consumer the retained input shapes a durable artifact. These effects have separate authority findings.
MEM-OBJ-aliases-generated separates optional configured instructions from symbolic scope controls. Retained operands can supply ranking or validation authority without a learned ranking policy or epistemic truth acceptance. MEM-OBJ-page-verifications supplies probabilities, hashes and short excerpts to later diagnostic consumers; it does not establish ordinary chat injection or a universal admission veto. Source withdrawal marks some pages stale but leaves them searchable, as MEM-RTE-source-withdrawal records.
Selection and transformation
The requested QA chain contains automatic pre-selection before the answer model and, alternatively, model-requested tools. These establish push and pull respectively, not two directions for every individual delivery. RT-RTE-preretrieval-chat supplies the selectors, open-page/collection alternatives, dataset augmentation and history budgets. A model rewrite contributes inferred judgment without upgrading the later lexical selector into embedding search. Full-page tool requests are pull; their path identifiers do not independently establish identifier-based push.
Consolidation describes the implemented reduction/combination mechanisms, not a guarantee of faithful preservation. Existing-page revision establishes evolution. Neither fluent generated prose nor the absence of a proof of entailment establishes synthesis. RT-RTE-document-ingest and RT-RTE-chat-save retain that semantic uncertainty. Index rebuilding is not by itself consolidation, and idempotent warning markers are not by themselves deduplication of retained claims. History forgetting concerns the later model-visible view, not deletion of full caller-held UI text.
Coverage and canonical identity
The reconciliation supersedes EPI-OBJ-dataset-rows with MEM-OBJ-datasets. Dataset findings therefore use the latter canonical destination, including where finance consumers are cited. Other overlapping objects and maintenance parts remain valid containers or distinct consumers, not supersessions. No other supersession changes a value here.
Initial dataset authorship, complete model-output derivation, every repair/evaluator path and cross-session conversation persistence are not supplied as settled facts. The unresolved units preserve those limits. No analyst declares an evidenced-absence record, so unestablished feedback or durable-summary routes do not become trace-learning negatives. The supported local yes yields an existence finding, not complete trace-learning/source coverage. Likewise there is no complete-value claim for partial authority, curation or selection inventories.
Source-read log
No source files were read or searched. The supplied accepted members and reconciliation were the only evidence inputs; no new records, quotations or evidence were added.