MDCP synthesis verification
Type: agentic-system-analyses/types/agentic-system-verification.md
Verification
The handed public synthesis supports its bounded conclusions. I checked its substantive statements against the supplied declarations, annotations, workflow account and reconciliation, including the peer-fix supersession. I also checked the supplied report and profile verification judgments and the empty synthesis answers. Neither judgment declares blockers or limits requiring additional carriage. No source ambiguity required reopening source files; no evidence was added and no target execution was performed.
Boundary, progression and context
The synthesis preserves the frozen whole-system functional boundary without claiming exhaustive inspection. Its evidence basis agrees with the boundary: SRC-1 supplies implementation and doctrine/design, not an observed agent workflow or causal experiment. External host responsibilities, the archive/rename notice and the excluded successor remain distinct.
The account of intake, documentation-first work, implementation, as-built reconciliation and submission agrees with RT-RTE-feature-work and the workflow account. It describes an interpreted procedure rather than an enforced state machine. Conditional human review, headless continuation and the submission-only delivery boundary remain visible. Vendor policy is not confused with mutable project content; RT-OBJ-mdcp, MEM-OBJ-shards and RT-BAP-skill-host support the distinction.
The context account preserves qualitative requested loading rather than a cumulative window cap. Optional host isolation does not become a specified worker envelope or return protocol. The static-size comparison retains its actual contrast, reported status and method limits: EPI-OBJ-context-size, EPI-RTE-context-size and EPI-CLM-context-size support the numbers and conditional text-size rationale, not measured task efficiency, recall or complete prompt savings.
Persistence, transformations and checking
The synthesis distinguishes current-document replacement from preserved ADRs and research observations using MEM-RTE-shard-authoring and MEM-OBJ-research. Accessible rationale is not promoted to demonstrated consultation.
Compiler selection, persisted derivatives and metadata, process-local cache and concrete later deterministic consumers remain separate in RT-RTE-compile-check, MEM-OBJ-compiled, MEM-OBJ-refs and MEM-OBJ-shard-cache. Derived publication is not treated as independent corroboration or observed agent recall.
The gate account preserves early orphan rejection, possible writes before late failure, caller-owned repair and conditional check coverage. Supported permissive options and alternate write paths remain beside the claim, not hidden behind a universal guarantee. The canonical MEM-RTE-peer-fix, RT-RTE-shard-import and RT-RTE-hook-extension support those alternatives. The synthesis respects the peer-fix supersession without counting it twice.
The narrow epistemic findings also retain their domains: EPI-RTE-path-probe concerns recognized existence claims under roots and exemptions; EPI-RTE-code-evidence concerns lexical occurrence, not declaration identity or prose support; EPI-RTE-inline-inserts imports text without accepting its truth. Semantic review and research warrant prescriptions remain positive findings without becoming observed claim acceptance. CI wiring is not deployed mandatory protection; RT-RTE-doc-review, EPI-CLM-research-warrant and RT-RTE-release-admission support these qualifications.
Feedback, independent properties and limitations
RT-RTE-skill-evaluation and EPI-OBJ-skill-description support the strongest contribution stated first: bounded feedback-driven candidate revision with later inference consumers. Trigger labels, scoring, blinded proposal history, reused test selection and separate production installation retain their distinct consequences. The account does not infer successful task performance or an untouched final test estimate.
The separate theory-builder, improved-capacity, reflection, autonomy and self-improvement findings stay within that route and RT-RTE-doc-review. Candidate/result reuse is not equated with formulated criticism; inspectable feedback capacity is not erased by missing execution evidence; production installation and subsequent causal dependence remain unestablished. No unsupported all-properties verdict follows.
The scenario-relative assessment and proposed resolving evidence follow these findings without ranking products or recommending adoption. The Limitations table carries the consequential source, host, coverage, measurement, acceptance, transformation and feedback gaps and excluded-surface boundaries. Reconciliation retains no unresolved conflict requiring another row. These are faithfully scoped uncertainties, not additional verification defects. No local record fault or material widening of the accepted conclusions was found.
Blockers
none
Limits
none