MDCP profile verification

Type: agentic-system-analyses/types/agentic-system-verification.md

Verification

The memory profile is supported as a partial comparison of retained project documentation, its access/publication derivatives and bounded maintainer feedback. I checked all ten axes against the handed records, their annotations and the supplied reconciliation. The profile answers file is empty; there was no refusal to adjudicate. No source files were reopened, no replacement records were constructed and no target execution was performed.

Objects, forms and provenance

• Storage substrate: files and repository storage for prescribed project documents are supported by MEM-OBJ-shards, MEM-OBJ-research and MEM-RTE-shard-authoring. Wired derivative-file persistence and later readers are supported by MEM-OBJ-compiled, MEM-OBJ-refs and RT-RTE-compile-check. The optimizer's in-memory history and temporary/optional files have later inference consumers, unlike the excluded compilation-only MEM-OBJ-shard-cache.
• Representational form: the profile distinguishes interpreted prose from links, ordering, registry fields and measurement data at fixed consumers. The optimizer unit groups text and scores, but its findings identify their separate interpretation and selection paths. This coarse grouping does not classify an opaque payload from a display summary or assert parametric memory. The relevant warrants are MEM-OBJ-shards, MEM-OBJ-refs, EPI-OBJ-context-size and RT-RTE-skill-evaluation.
• Lineage: prescribed authorship, mechanical import, deterministic derivation and feedback-derived description revision remain distinct. RT-RTE-shard-import, EPI-RTE-inline-inserts, EPI-RTE-code-evidence and RT-RTE-skill-evaluation support the emitted mappings. Known subsequent revision is not used to resolve initial description provenance or arbitrary callback derivation.

Consumers, admission and maintenance

• Behavioral authority: interpreted project contracts and evidence support instruction and knowledge; index/registry consumption supports routing. Recurrence-derived checking criteria support claimed validation and conditional enforcement, not a general veto over writes. The optimizer separately supports feedback's learning, ranking and continuation effects and the candidate's instruction effect. MEM-OBJ-research, RT-RTE-doc-review, RT-RTE-compile-check and RT-RTE-skill-evaluation preserve these consumer/effect distinctions. No authority finding establishes truth acceptance or observed compliance.
• Write agency: agent-led admission without mandatory per-content approval supports claimed automatic agency. Mechanical import, peer mutation, derivative generation and internal optimizer selection support wired automatic agency. The profile does not infer manual agency from caller initiation or generic author identity. Conditional human review and final installation remain unresolved rather than being erased by the automatic witnesses. See MEM-RTE-shard-authoring, RT-RTE-feature-work, MEM-RTE-peer-fix and RT-RTE-skill-evaluation.
• Curation operations: merge/reduction and duplicate removal are afforded by semantic review; current-entry revision and history-preserving supersession are prescribed; optimizer replacement is wired evolution. These follow RT-RTE-doc-review, MEM-OBJ-research, MEM-RTE-shard-authoring and RT-RTE-skill-evaluation. Rebuilding, formatting and arbitrary callbacks do not acquire unsupported synthesis, decay or promotion values.

Later consumption and trace-fed updates

• Read-back direction: requested host reads and caller-invoked file consumers support pull. Automatic supply of retained descriptions and feedback to subsequent optimizer inference calls supports push. The upstream request to optimize does not make those later model inputs requested memory returns. RT-RTE-feature-work, RT-RTE-compile-check and RT-RTE-skill-evaluation support this operation-level distinction.
• Read-back signal: the optimizer's iteration trigger, current candidate/failures/history and fixed field filtering support coarse supply. Candidate scoring is not an inferred relevance selector. Requested paths and manifest matches do not establish identifier-based push. Local pull-route inapplicability is not generalized over the unresolved alternatives.
• Trace learning: RT-RTE-skill-evaluation and EPI-OBJ-skill-description establish an automatic feedback-to-retained-policy-to-later-consumer chain. Wired yes does not require production installation or demonstrated improvement. The separate recurrence-responsive guidance route remains claimed and partially covered, consistent with RT-RTE-doc-review. No unsupported local or system-wide no is emitted.
• Trace source: subprocess execution outcomes and failures support tool-traces for the optimizer update. The profile does not turn static labels into session logs or infer event-stream origin merely from runtime occurrence. Unresolved recurrence origins and broader feedback inputs retain uncertainty rather than acquiring a source value by analogy.

Coverage and reconciliation disposition

All axes retain partial coverage and identify included unresolved alternatives. The positive findings remain local: none upgrades an uninspected complementary product, evaluator artifact, callback or initial/final admission. Missing run evidence limits exercise and benefit, not the inspectable wiring. The exclusion of unchanged vendor policy, provider internals and ordinary current-run state is consistent with the accumulated-memory boundary.

The peer-fix supersession is respected through canonical MEM-RTE-peer-fix; it does not alter the mutation finding. Separate compile-body/output and candidate/installed-policy identities are preserved. Grouped units are coarse but their notes distinguish the consequential parts and consumers; they do not yield an unsupported comparison value or complete-coverage claim. The stated uncertainties require neither additional source inspection nor a publication limit beyond the uncertainty already carried in the profile itself.

Blockers

none

Limits

none