llm-context-base profile verification

Type: agentic-system-analyses/types/agentic-system-verification.md

Verification

I checked all ten axes in the profile against the handed declarations and annotations, applying the profile type's natural units, evidence bases and coverage definitions. Reconciliation resolves the source-original and pattern-capture duplicates to MEM-OBJ-sources and MEM-RTE-pattern-capture; the profile uses those canonical records. Valid containers and narrower parts remain distinct. No frozen-source read or new evidence was needed.

Storage is supported within the target-file boundary. File retention and conditional repository persistence coexist; ignored journal/private bodies are not represented as necessarily committed. MEM-OBJ-knowledge, MEM-OBJ-sources, and MEM-RTE-compact-reload cover ordinary, original-format and optional local-control storage. Excluding external host transcripts, summaries and weights follows the declared target responsibility, rather than resolving their opacity by assigning a known value.

Form and lineage preserve unresolved original and embedded-artifact parts. Prose at assistant consumers is distinguished from fixed-rule metadata and sentinel consumption. The converter supports wired symbolic consumption and other-compiled derivation, not universal semantic preservation: EPI-RTE-metadata-transform. Authored, imported and trace-extracted paths retain their separate local warrants; known subsequent derivations do not resolve initial corpus provenance.

Authority findings identify evidence/context, standing guidance, update learning, relevance ranking, routing and candidate criteria at their respective consumers. In particular, MEM-RTE-pattern-capture and RT-BAP-instruction-load distinguish update from downstream instruction force. Revisable completion guidance supports claimed validation, not factual acceptance or host enforcement. Opaque artifact effects remain unresolved.

Write agency correctly separates explicit content supply/approval from model and software admission. Clear pattern capture differs from ambiguous capture and approved restructuring; operator invocation does not make individual converter admissions manual. See MEM-RTE-pattern-capture, RT-RTE-context-review, and RT-RTE-metadata-migrate. The unresolved outcome, saved-answer and publication admissions do not generate unsupported positives.

Curation findings follow the documented transformations: reduced extraction/conversation observations support consolidation; corrections and maintenance support evolution; completion raises lifecycle tier; retirement withdraws current reliance and reduces priority. Default post-filing original disposal supports bounded forgetting, not an automatic seven-day timer. MEM-RTE-lint-maintenance and EPI-RTE-completion-status support these distinctions. Mechanical formatting and semantically unspecified answer synthesis do not acquire deduplication or synthesis values merely from their names.

Requested answers are pull; startup/task guidance and proactive precedents are push. Coarse phase/age/sentinel selection remains separate from topic/tag matching and model judgment. RT-RTE-session-start, RT-RTE-knowledge-query, and their memory annotations support these mappings. Paths alone are not treated as identifier-based targeting. Unspecified linked-code and original-reprocessing selection keeps both read-back axes partial.

The claimed trace-learning positives connect automatic conversational extraction, durable text and later context/guidance consumers. MEM-RTE-pattern-capture supplies the explicit chain; RT-RTE-capture-file and its memory annotation support the conversational working-knowledge branch. Session turns support session-logs without requiring target-owned verbatim transcript retention. Manual branches, mechanical conversion and raw control/path logging do not qualify. Additional outcome, synthesis and operation-summary chains remain unresolved rather than being declared absent. Neither trace axis claims improved capacity, observed activation or causal benefit.

I checked the discard, metadata/link and lifecycle discrepancies and the workflow's active-template versus draft-admission mismatch. None establishes an additional supported comparison value or defeats the profile's bounded findings. Claimed prompt behavior, afforded integrations and wired conversion remain distinct; no observed or causal basis is asserted. The remaining partial assessments faithfully express their recorded uncertainty.

Blockers

none

Limits

none