pm-llm-wiki profile verification

Type: agentic-system-analyses/types/agentic-system-verification.md

Verification

I checked all ten axes in the memory profile, including each finding's scope, natural unit, evidence basis and inventory assessment. I used the handed runtime, memory, epistemic and workflow accounts, resolving the duplicate object identities through the supplied reconciliation. The memory handles remain canonical without discarding the epistemic findings on the same objects. No source reads were needed, and no additional records or evidence were introduced.

  • Storage substrate and representational form: The scoped inventory consists of retained Markdown objects and changed local instructions, not external provider state or model weights. Grouping objects with the same file substrate and reader-interpreted form does not hide a differently classified part. Status labels, numbers and catalog paths do not establish a shipped fixed-rule memory consumer. The known file/natural-language classifications are supported by MEM-OBJ-sources, MEM-OBJ-problems, MEM-OBJ-index, MEM-OBJ-log and RT-OBJ-schema, together with the remaining named page records. Optional Git and host machinery are appropriately outside these classifications.
  • Lineage: Imported evidence, compiled product state, authored context/instructions and trace-extracted digest content have distinct recorded paths. The profile does not treat a known subsequent transformation as proof of original export provenance. Its partial assessment preserves missing export and session provenance rather than claiming a complete lineage account. The journal's authored bookkeeping and the exploration's authored synthesis can coexist with their derivation descriptions; these do not establish raw-session extraction. See MEM-OBJ-sources, MEM-OBJ-digest, MEM-OBJ-log, MEM-OBJ-prd and RT-RTE-stage-upgrade.
  • Behavioral authority: The profile separates retained product context at synthesis, catalog summaries at relevance selection, question tags at discovery planning, reversal criteria at review, and changed instructions at maintenance. These support knowledge, ranking, routing, validation and instruction respectively. Learning authority is separately located at the digest-fed durable update, not inferred from downstream knowledge authority. None is upgraded to executable enforcement or improved capacity. See MEM-BAP-wiki-synthesis, MEM-OBJ-index, MEM-OBJ-open-questions, MEM-OBJ-decisions, RT-BAP-schema-agent and RT-RTE-source-ingest.
  • Write agency: The manual/automatic distinction follows admission rather than authorship, file I/O or workflow initiation. Explicit source selection, digest approval, protected changes and pilot filing confirmation support manual findings; freely admitted ordinary updates support automatic findings. The unresolved assumption rules and general exploration admission remain separate from those known mechanisms. Partial coverage is faithful to MEM-OBJ-assumptions, MEM-RTE-digest-admission, RT-RTE-source-ingest and RT-RTE-query-fileback.
  • Curation: The claimed findings distinguish reduced source/theme representations, revision of existing pages, new interpretive claims in the exploration, and withdrawal of current decision reliance while retaining history. Novel interpretive content need not be warranted or accepted to support synthesis. The accepted epistemic account supplies the price-generalization finding preserved by reconciliation; it does not establish observed generation. Requested competitor normalization is unresolved rather than emitted as deduplication. Staleness and index updates are not incorrectly classified as decay or promotion. See MEM-RTE-digest-admission, MEM-OBJ-overview, RT-RTE-query-fileback, the epistemic authority ledger, MEM-OBJ-decisions and RT-RTE-stage-upgrade.
  • Read-back direction and signal: Requested query, ingest, lint and instruction reads constitute the scoped pull inventory. Model relevance selection within those requests is not another unsolicited delivery operation. External host injection is excluded, not an unresolved included alternative. Thus known pull coverage and inapplicable push signal are consistent with RT-RTE-query-fileback, RT-RTE-source-ingest, RT-RTE-wiki-lint, RT-BAP-schema-agent and MEM-OBJ-index.
  • Trace learning and source: The qualifying positive is the automatic downstream wiki update from the manually admitted interaction-derived digest, with durable output designated for later query consumption. Manual digest admission does not make that subsequent mechanism manual. Other candidate routes remain unresolved; no unsupported local or system-wide negative is emitted. Product-interaction origin alone does not resolve the original exports into the controlled source classes. Partial trace-learning coverage and not-determinable trace source therefore preserve the supported positive without inventing a source taxonomy finding. See MEM-OBJ-digest, MEM-RTE-digest-admission, RT-RTE-source-ingest, MEM-BAP-wiki-synthesis and MEM-OBJ-log.

All positive bases remain claimed. The records supply prompt-defined mechanisms and fictional reported examples, not inspected executing code, authenticated operation or causal benefit. The workflow's separate in-message and filed delivery endpoints do not upgrade later PRD consumption to observed behavior; see workflow account. Stale startup context, repeated intel and qualifier loss affect freshness, normalization and warrant, not the existence of the classified file, instruction or knowledge paths. The profile preserves these distinctions and makes no uniform correctness or compliance claim.

The unresolved coverage already expressed by partial or not-determinable assessments is faithful uncertainty, not an additional verification limit. I found no unsupported emitted comparison value, evidence-strength upgrade or materially misleading complete-coverage assertion requiring correction.

Blockers

none

Limits

none