LLM Project Wiki reconciliation

Type: agentic-system-analyses/types/agentic-system-reconciliation-report.md

Reconciliation

Shared boundary and route connections

All four reports concern the same frozen prompt package and preserve the boundary's distinction between shipped instructions and an unavailable generated installation. Runtime routes carry claimed design and uninspected operation; the epistemic ledger calls their architecture doctrine only. These are different status fields, not competing findings. Neither establishes deployed enforcement, successful cross-session use or benefit. The Source register supplies no execution or causal evidence.

RT-RTE-vault-bootstrap connects project inspection, scaffolding, copying, page construction, consumer wiring and final self-audit. The workflow account selects that same route and annotates its phase handoffs and delivery. It declares no competing route. Memory annotations describe the resulting stores and later reads; the epistemic ledger separates transformation, checking, admission and retention within the route. Function-level ledger entries are not new declarations or duplicate route identities.

RT-RTE-source-sync, RT-RTE-diff-ingest and RT-RTE-wiki-lookup form the prescribed copy → model revision → later consumption chain. Open gaps add a task-derived input to revision. RT-RTE-gap-audit is broader repair across invocations, not an automatic bootstrap exception handler. Workflow and memory both retain this separation. The reports do not infer complete inputs from a sync completion message or complete refresh from a single Git comparison.

Duplicate identities and valid containers

Amendment: EPI-OBJ-sources is superseded by MEM-OBJ-sources. Both name the generated Sources/Memory, Sources/Rules and Sources/Docs snapshots, copied from project files and subsequently interpreted by bootstrap/ingest/audit models. Both retain mixed prose and symbolic excerpts, unknown original authorship/warrant and the selected interpretive warning header. Their evidence is SRC-1's Phase 1–2 design, with copying passages retained in these records and RT-RTE-source-sync. This connects the epistemic inventory and acquisition ledger to the memory store; it changes no finding or status. The producer route and current invocation prompt are different referents, not duplicate objects.

Amendment: EPI-OBJ-log is superseded by MEM-OBJ-log. Both identify generated log.md: instructed append-only Markdown carrying gap diagnoses and maintenance summaries for later model repair. Their retained G0/Phase 4 passages support the same read-back and deferral role. The epistemic record's distinction between reports and verified acceptance history remains intact alongside memory's distinction between summaries and raw traces. A consuming command or repair route is not the log itself.

Exact identity is ruled out between EPI-OBJ-wiki-pages and MEM-OBJ-wiki: the former includes page content and frontmatter, while the latter explicitly excludes access metadata and the health dashboard. MEM-OBJ-page-metadata separately declares the frontmatter/path/date/status part. The epistemic record distinguishes those parts and their consumers without assigning metadata checks a semantic truth license. It can remain a valid container alongside the declared content and metadata parts; no split supersession is warranted by an incompatible combined finding. The epistemic inventory and ledger's page references include both functions, whereas memory's content-only conclusions concern the narrower part.

Exact identity is likewise ruled out between EPI-OBJ-index and either MEM-OBJ-index or MEM-OBJ-health alone. The epistemic container names index.md and Wiki/_Health.md; memory separately declares intent/TOC navigation and the diagnostic dashboard. Both parts already have records, and the container preserves their distinct model-selection and plugin-predicate functions and evidence limits. Retain the container rather than supersede it merely because memory uses finer records.

MEM-OBJ-templates has no epistemic or runtime object duplicate. Templates, RT-OBJ-schema, RT-OBJ-wiki-ingest and RT-OBJ-setup-prompt are different specified files with different production or instruction roles, not alternate labels for compiled page instances.

EPI-RTE-schema-check and EPI-RTE-link-check are declared diagnostic parts of RT-RTE-gap-audit. They inspect text and return diagnostics; the parent also selects repairs, changes files and retains an audit summary. Neither part duplicates the whole audit, and neither supersedes its repair findings.

The claim records also retain distinct subjects. EPI-CLM-compiled-knowledge concerns accumulation and compilation; EPI-CLM-answer-coverage concerns wiki-only task sufficiency. Neither is identical to RT-CLM-wiki-first, a selection policy, or RT-CLM-audit-completeness, a repair-breadth claim. MEM-CLM-retention-limits concerns deletion/withdrawal rather than RT-CLM-sources-immutability's layer authority and write policy. Shared supporting mechanisms do not establish claim identity.

Independent convergence and integration dispositions

Runtime, memory, epistemic and workflow converge on model-directed admission without required per-content human approval. The epistemic report distinguishes that admission from recorded epistemic acceptance; this does not contradict the runtime's requested source comparisons, quality guidance or self-audit. The narrower EPI-RTE-schema-check strengthens the account of the example's limits without replacing RT-CLM-audit-completeness. The link diagnostic adds a separate text-matching limitation, not a competing account of all model review.

The memory integration issues require no runtime correction. Initial entity coverage remains unknown because standard sync copies memory/rules/docs while bootstrap inspection and audit permit broader code reads. Metadata path consistency, ingest status reset, closed-gap notation and source-deletion propagation remain unspecified; these limit universal freshness and withdrawal conclusions, not the existence of the prescribed routes. The G1/G6 step references disagree with Phase 2's seven-step numbering, but the substantive gap-resolution instruction remains in RT-RTE-diff-ingest. This is a discrepancy inside the source design, not a disagreement between these reports.

The audit's method-file repairs connect to two different intended authority channels: RT-BAP-project-rules guides later project work, while RT-BAP-maintenance-rules guides later maintenance. Neither is duplicate Wiki factual content or an archived Sources instruction copy. Memory's retained summaries and epistemic policy-adaptation row agree with the runtime's claimed reflection and improvement-directed self-change pathway. They do not establish criticism-dependent theory iteration, successful learning or exercised self-improvement; the runtime's independent statuses remain unchanged.

No supplied correction answers or declined objections require a separate disposition. No cross-report disagreement remains after these identity and containment distinctions. No analyst record or status is rewritten here, and no frozen source was read beyond the supplied members.