RSIAgent synthesis verification
Type: agentic-system-analyses/types/agentic-system-verification.md
Verification
The handed public synthesis supports publication as a bounded implementation account. I checked its substantive statements against the supplied records, the two reconciliation supersessions, the settled report-verification limit and the profile verification. No new source inspection, evidence or correction was needed. The synthesis answers file is empty; no synthesis refusal or previous synthesis-verification judgment was supplied.
Evidence and runtime. The opening distinguishes inspected implementation, design instructions and attributed outcomes from observed operation and causal benefit. Its whole-system functional scope and external exclusions agree with the boundary. The task progression preserves code-owned scheduling and parsing, model-owned action content, distinct Verifier context, simulator rather than human Ask responses, and post-harness official scoring. These are supported by RT-RTE-task-execution, RT-RTE-candidate-verification and EPI-RTE-official-score. The public text does not infer correctness from Actor Done or a committed verdict. It retains the distinction between instructed requirement-level investigation and lexical verdict admission, and between observations and warranted interpretations (EPI-RTE-candidate-check, EPI-RTE-verdict-admission, EPI-RTE-probe-check, EPI-RTE-observation-import). Confinement, mirror rollback, trusted operations and remote effects remain explicitly path-scoped rather than becoming system-wide guarantees.
Learning, publication and later consumption. The public progression preserves the same Actor's terminal-evidence context, requested corpus criticism, separate diagnosis, Actor-owned semantic readiness and host-owned boundary veto. It does not turn the Verifier's task judgment into memory certification. Complete-tree publication, serial branch reconciliation, staged installation and the weaker direct replacement API retain their distinct guarantees (RT-RTE-learning-admission, EPI-RTE-memory-proposal, EPI-RTE-memory-admission, EPI-RTE-bank-retention, MEM-OBJ-memory-journal). The canonical bank and WORK LOG references follow the reconciliation's supersessions; no superseded object is treated as a separate retained product.
Inventory delivery is not conflated with selected content reads, compliance or benefit. Upload-failure differences and guest-copy mutability remain beside the relevant claims. Curriculum's notes, diagnosis and outcome channels are not collapsed into the Actor bank, and the empty-bank ablation is not described as removing those other inputs (RT-BAP-actor-method, MEM-OBJ-memory, MEM-OBJ-curriculum-notes). Opaque payloads do not become uniformly natural-language knowledge, accepted claims or autonomously authored initial content.
Workflow and continuity. The representative OSWorld progression is supported without generalizing its admission details to ALE. It retains replayable project handoff, fresh testing after practice, the distinction between STALLED and correctness, policy-dependent PASS review, admissible final FAIL, and refusal of UNVERIFIED development completion. Freeze and delivery are protocol results, not evidence of successful task performance or learning (RT-RTE-curriculum-search, WF-RTE-phase-transition). Conditional folding, fresh-context restart, substantive Verifier replay, independently fallible scratch retention and selected lineage admission retain their different scopes (MEM-RTE-worklog-fold, MEM-RTE-verifier-replay, MEM-OBJ-verifier-scratch, RT-RTE-lineage-recovery). The carried image-eviction omission remains warranted and is stated both in the progression and the limitations table, without implying that Verifier replay drops substantive pixels.
Independent improvement findings. The synthesis leads with the wired improvement-directed contribution, then separately preserves each theory condition's afforded, claimed or wired status. It does not infer completed criticism, improved future capacity, reflective method revision or autonomous theory building from persistence or computational role assignment. The agent-plus-bank boundary and independently specifiable capability objective support the marked dispositional self-change claim, while the missing evidence-to-update and update-to-later-behavior links prevent exercised or successful self-improvement conclusions (RT-RTE-learning-admission, RT-RTE-curriculum-search). Fixed-parameter doctrine is not upgraded to immutable provider weights. Target-conditioned adaptation is distinguished from held-out generalization; reported gains and conditional arithmetic are not treated as matched comparisons or component effects (EPI-CLM-reported-scores, EPI-RTE-score-report). The proposed resolving evidence addresses these specific uncertainties rather than promising that traces alone establish benefit.
The limitations table carries the consequential evidence, provenance, payload, provider, recovery, context, effect and outcome constraints. The reconciliation supplies no unresolved conflict, and the profile verification declares no additional limit. No central conclusion, unsupported comparison value, false absence or complete-coverage assertion requires repair. Ordinary faithfully scoped uncertainty is not promoted to additional findings below.
Blockers
none
Limits
- The retained working-context inventory omits Curriculum's project-boundary image eviction. The synthesis faithfully carries this settled omission in its continuity account and Limitations, with RT-RTE-curriculum-search, MEM-OBJ-durable-images and MEM-RTE-verifier-replay. The supplied report-verification finding concerns SRC-1,
explore/practice_loop.pyandexplore/phase1_wave.py: private attachments are removed from live Curriculum history while text and a reissue-Look note remain. Withhold a complete image eviction/reload inventory and universal Curriculum visual continuity. The bank-learning route and Verifier-specific substantive replay remain supported; archived images do not establish their delivery to every later Curriculum call. Dedicated records tracing eviction and subsequent reload would resolve the inventory gap. No additional source evidence is asserted here.