Cortex profile verification
Type: agentic-system-analyses/types/agentic-system-verification.md
Verification
I checked all ten axes of the memory profile, including unit boundaries, positive values, evidence bases and inventory assessments, against the supplied runtime, memory, epistemic and workflow members. Reconciliation identifies three supersessions: the retained summary, access adaptation and requested diagnostics use the canonical memory records. The profile preserves those resolutions without treating supersession as stronger evidence. No source files were read and no new evidence or quotations were introduced.
Storage and form. SQLite content, vectors, metadata, configuration values, logs and historical rows are supported by the memory part records, including MEM-OBJ-documents, MEM-OBJ-embeddings, MEM-OBJ-query-log and MEM-OBJ-document-versions. MEM-OBJ-relationships supports the graph substrate; RT-RTE-maintain-knowledge supports file-based archive recovery. The form inventory separates prose, fixed symbolic interpretation and dense distributed vectors. JSON envelopes do not eliminate historical prose, and vector bytes do not establish either a separate vector database or retained provider weights. Grouped storage units share the same substrate and coverage warrant. The known assessments are supported for these scoped physical and representational distinctions; they do not assert known provenance or universal historical consumption.
Lineage. The partial assessment preserves caller authoring, import, subsequent compilation and activity-derived paths without authenticating their upstream origins. MEM-OBJ-summary supports caller/model/fallback alternatives; MEM-OBJ-embeddings bounds embedding provenance; MEM-OBJ-retrieval-weights leaves nondefault initialization unresolved. Raw query history has recorded activity provenance, but the profile does not use that finding as an automatic-learning witness.
Behavioral authority. Informational delivery follows RT-BAP-knowledge-delivery. Ranking is supported by retained text, vectors, connectivity and recency at RT-RTE-retrieve-context, without adding access counts or tier to its score. Metadata and graph assertions select scopes and inputs. Existing-endpoint and importer duplicate checks support validation and enforced skipping through EPI-RTE-structure-check and RT-RTE-direct-import. The access-update consumer and downstream tier-preservation consumer have separately explained learning and routing effects in MEM-RTE-access-promotion and MEM-OBJ-tier. Some units group consumers with the same emitted value; that does not upgrade dormant weights/history to established authority. The partial inventory has the local recovery omission stated below.
Write agency. The profile distinguishes unresolved generic-caller decisions from automatic importer admission, model/software transformations, logging and snapshots. Operator invocation does not make each generated result manual. The separately scoped manual finding concerns explicit replacement of stores from a selected archive, as supported by RT-RTE-maintain-knowledge, rather than approval of ordinary processing. Nondefault weight admission remains unresolved. The partial assessment is supported.
Curation. Content-level importer duplicate exclusion, existing-entry revision, tier promotion and recency downweighting support the emitted operations through RT-RTE-direct-import, MEM-OBJ-embeddings, MEM-RTE-access-promotion and RT-RTE-retrieve-context. Summary consolidation is only afforded, consistent with the implemented request and unresolved model meaning in EPI-RTE-metadata-generation. Missing output evidence does not negate that affordance or establish synthesis. The inactivity helper retains its afforded basis and missing shipped caller; it is not upgraded by wired recency scoring. Partial coverage preserves these distinctions.
Read-back direction and signal. The handed records establish requested retrieval, projections, diagnosis and processing reads, not an independent unsolicited delivery operation. MEM-RTE-issue-delivery prevents proactive wording from becoming a push finding. Dormant getters are not hypothetical consumer routes. Thus the known pull inventory and inapplicable push-signal assessment are supported within the declared service boundary. Query, identifier and embedding inputs on requested reads do not establish push signals. Explicit archive restoration likewise fulfills a caller-selected recovery request rather than establishing unsolicited delivery.
Trace learning and source. MEM-OBJ-access-count, MEM-RTE-access-promotion and MEM-OBJ-tier establish automatic activity-fed counters and durable tier changes reaching later display and enrichment. This supports wired trace learning and tool-interaction origin without requiring new knowledge, trained parameters or demonstrated improvement. Generic captured/imported documents remain unresolved as possible trace inputs. Query retention and snapshots alone do not establish another qualifying transformation; MEM-ABS-adaptation-wiring bounds the missing ranking-update bridge. Both trace axes correctly remain partial, not system-wide negatives or complete inventories.
No handed cross-report conflict changes these findings. Missing execution and causal evidence bounds all positive implementation findings; no emitted finding claims observed operation or benefit. The profile's uncertainty about upstream provenance, generic trace-bearing inputs and model-output meaning is faithfully scoped uncertainty, not a separate defect.
Blockers
none
Limits
- The partial behavioral-authority inventory in the profile does not separately classify the archive's effect at the restore consumer, although archive recovery is explicitly included in scope and RT-RTE-maintain-knowledge establishes retained-store replacement from an archive. Consequently archive-recovery authority cannot be compared from this inventory, and the broader routing/selection units do not provide a consumer-by-consumer recovery account. This omission does not invalidate the emitted authority findings or their local warrants: the axis already declares partial coverage, and no finding asserts that archives lack operational effect. The storage, form and requested-read conclusions remain supported.