AIDE2 profile verification

Type: agentic-system-analyses/types/agentic-system-verification.md

Verification

I checked all ten axes of the memory profile, including each finding's support and basis, unit scope, coverage assessment and unresolved alternatives. The reconciliation identifies the memory-declared summary and signature objects as canonical; the profile cites MEM-OBJ-candidate-summary and MEM-OBJ-error-signatures, not their superseded duplicates. Reviewer text and scores remain separately assessable parts, not conflicting accounts. No unresolved cross-report conflict changes a profile value.

Storage is appropriately not-determinable. A codebase, prompt assembly and candidate-associated state do not identify a controlled storage substrate. Representational form distinguishes interpreted text, executable rules, numerical scores and symbolic deduplication inputs. Lineage distinguishes trace-derived history from authored harness revisions while preserving unknown initial provenance and mixed payloads. The partial form and lineage inventories do not classify opaque alternatives through an AIDE85 witness (MEM-OBJ-candidate-summary, MEM-OBJ-review-feedback, MEM-OBJ-strategy-state, RT-OBJ-agent-code). Some units group parts or consumers, but their findings and notes identify the operative paths sufficiently to support the emitted values without implying uniform coverage.

Behavioral authority distinguishes derived context's knowledge force, retained experience at update consumers, score/label ranking and routing, and retained executable organization. The robustness reminder supplies instruction; the short-output criterion supplies validation and an enforced retry for task scripts, not outer harness admission. These findings do not imply model compliance or improved capacity. Write agency separates software/model admission from human experiment setup and from unknown summary creation control. The accepted records support automatic signature admission, reviewer extraction, strategy updates and private-grade successor admission (MEM-RTE-failure-injection, EPI-RTE-reviewer-extraction, RT-RTE-harness-admission, RT-RTE-robustness-controls).

Curation findings follow the documented transformations: history consolidation, signature reduction and deduplication, harness evolution and incumbent promotion. Uncertain semantic fidelity does not establish synthesis; omitted prompt detail does not establish physical deletion or decay. The revised partial AIDE47 unit now retains claimed consolidation from MEM-CLM-prompt-compression, resolving the predecessor's local omission. It does not extend AIDE85's specific selection rules to AIDE47 or infer AIDEhuman transformations from prompt size alone. Unknown archive maintenance remains explicit.

Read-back direction and signal distinguish automatic supply from unspecified exploration. Root/recency, availability and bug-rate/recurrence filtering support push and coarse selection. Error-text equality does not establish lexical query retrieval, and node labels do not establish identity-match delivery. Unknown artifact exploration and alternative prompts prevent complete direction or selector coverage rather than proving pull absent (MEM-RTE-summary-delivery, MEM-RTE-failure-injection, RT-RTE-harness-admission).

I rechecked the predecessor's summary-production objection and the author's correction against the current fields and dependent rationale. The summary trace-learning and trace-source units now emit no positive findings and remain not-determinable. Their notes correctly distinguish automatic later inclusion from unestablished production control. Consolidation, trace-extracted lineage and later knowledge consumption remain independently supported. The rationale preserves the same distinction; the previous unsupported summary positive is no longer present (MEM-OBJ-candidate-summary, MEM-RTE-summary-delivery).

The remaining trace-learning positives have documented automatic updates, retained behavior-shaping results and later consumers: signature extraction, reviewer-derived selection feedback, and evaluation-guided harness rewriting. Execution/scoring output supports tool-traces; the linked proposal/grade sequence supports trajectories for the outer update. Opaque mixed inputs remain unresolved rather than receiving session-log or event-stream classifications. These routes establish claimed trace-fed adaptation, not independently observed improvement or model-weight training (MEM-RTE-failure-injection, EPI-RTE-reviewer-extraction, RT-RTE-harness-admission, RT-BAP-incumbent-code). All positive bases appropriately remain claimed; author-reported operation does not establish inspected wiring, raw observed runs or component causality.

The remaining uncertainty is faithfully expressed in the profile's own assessments and notes. It does not require an additional publication limit. Source-read log: none; this verification used only the supplied members and records and added no evidence or quotations.

Blockers

none

Limits

none